The India-Pakistan Handshake Controversy: Sportsmanship Or Statement?

The Asia Cup clash between India and Pakistan in Dubai on Sunday was expected to generate headlines for cricketing reasons, but the biggest talking point came after the match – or rather, after the final ball was bowled.

India’s players, led by captain Suryakumar Yadav, chose not to take part in the customary handshake with their Pakistani counterparts. Instead, they returned to their dressing room, shutting the door as the Pakistani side waited on the field. What might have been seen as a small ritual in most other games quickly turned into a storm, drawing in politics, public sentiment, and the long-running tensions between the two nations.

Pakistan’s cricket board immediately reacted. Team manager Naveed Akram Cheema lodged a formal protest with the match referee, calling the behaviour “unsporting” and “against the spirit of the game.” PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi went further, posting on X that it was “utterly disappointing to witness the lack of sportsmanship. Dragging politics into cricket is not only unnecessary but damaging to the game we all love.” The PCB has also written to the Asian Cricket Council to take up the matter.

For their part, India’s camp stood firmly by the decision. Captain Suryakumar Yadav told reporters that avoiding the handshake “was not spontaneous” but taken in alignment with the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the government. “There are a few things in life that come ahead of sportsman spirit,” he said. “We stand with the families of the victims of the Pahalgam attack, and this win is dedicated to the Indian armed forces.” In their telling, the snub was not about individuals or even the sport itself, but about sending a message that cricket cannot be divorced from the wider reality in which these players live. The incident immediately divided opinion. Many Indians rallied behind the team, seeing the no-handshake stance as a powerful statement that some things are bigger than the game.

The controversy also comes against the backdrop of Suryakumar Yadav himself being trolled earlier this year when he shook hands with Pakistan’s Salman Ali Agha during the unveiling of the Asia Cup trophy. At the time, many Indian fans accused him of being too friendly with the opposition despite rising political tensions. That criticism may well have shaped his stance in Dubai, where the Indian team avoided any physical contact altogether.

But there was an equally forceful backlash. Many fans, commentators, and former players – not only in Pakistan but globally – lamented the decision as petty and unworthy of a great cricketing nation. They pointed out that handshakes are not just about niceties; they are symbolic of respect, a reminder that competition can be fierce but never inhumane. To them, refusing this simple gesture was a sign of hostility and a politicisation of sport that risks setting a dangerous precedent. Former Pakistan pacer Shoaib Akhtar called it “a sad day for cricket” and urged both boards to “keep cricket away from the politics of hate.”

On social media, reactions were as heated as one might expect. Some saw hypocrisy: India had no problem sharing the field with Pakistan for three hours of play, critics argued, but when it came to a 10-second handshake, suddenly a boycott was invoked. Others said it was “pathetic and indecent,” or a reflection of how politics has clouded even the most basic expressions of civility. A few went further, calling it an act of “hate and bigotry” that diminished the spirit of the game and alienated fans who look to cricket as one of the rare bridges between the two nations. Even some Indians took to social media to express discomfort, questioning what they saw as hypocrisy by their own team – pointing out that if players could compete side by side for hours, refusing a handshake at the end felt selective and unnecessary.

Following the controversy, the PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi demands immediate removal of Match Referee Andy Pycroft, alleging that he had requested the team captains to refrain from shaking hands at the time of the toss, which is customary. The debate continues of whether Pakistan will continue to play the rest of the games of the Asia Cup if match referee Andy Pycroft of Zimbabwe is not removed from the Asia Cup.

What the episode ultimately reveals is how fragile the space between sport and politics has become in the India-Pakistan context. For many Indians, the refusal to shake hands was an act of solidarity and dignity; for many Pakistanis, it was seen as humiliation and hostility. Both sides frame their view as a matter of principle. In truth, the deeper issue is that cricket between these countries has never been “just cricket.” Every handshake, every anthem, every stare across the pitch carries layers of history and grievance.

The risk is that this symbolic snub hardens divisions further, encouraging tit-for-tat gestures in future contests and eroding the very spirit of cricket. Where are the basic etiquettes of the game, the handshakes and courtesies that remind us why cricket has always been called a gentleman’s sport? For Pakistan, it felt like their players were left humiliated despite doing nothing wrong on the field, and many believe the refusal crossed a line between politics and sportsmanship. A handshake does not erase tragedy, nor does it diminish solidarity – it simply acknowledges the contest and the opponent’s effort. By walking away from it, India may have won the game but lost the spirit of it. This spirit and the reminder of it has been laid down in a 2000 Spirit of Cricket Code by the MCC and all cricket playing nations are urged to follow it and uphold sportsmanship – a defining mark of the game, in the highest regard. At moments like these, it becomes clear that cricket can only retain its soul if players rise above politics, rather than allowing national bitterness to decide even the most basic rituals of the sport.

25 Thoughts I Had While Watching Aabeer Gulaal In Cinema